Comments on: Why Can’t Women be Scientists? https://rhodesandrose.com/2009/07/28/why-cant-women-be-scientists/ Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:34:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Stu Cranstence https://rhodesandrose.com/2009/07/28/why-cant-women-be-scientists/#comment-5009 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:34:28 +0000 http://rhodesandrose.com/?p=313#comment-5009 Kate,
I am the first to acknowledge that women do have some value in society. Believe me, I know women. I’m married to one! As far as the women you’ve mentioned, Marie Curie, Diane Fosse, Grace Hopper and Jane Goodall, I have no idea who they are but I’m sure they are very nice (in limited doses). But Kate, to disparage
Albert Einstein, one of the greatest astronauts of all time, only demonstrates my point; That women, though sometimes amusing, can never be scientists.
Well , I’m glad i was able to set you straight, Kate. If you have any other questions or are confused in any way, please, don’t hesitate to contact me. Stu cranstence

]]> By: Kate https://rhodesandrose.com/2009/07/28/why-cant-women-be-scientists/#comment-5008 Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:11:37 +0000 http://rhodesandrose.com/?p=313#comment-5008 Domineering ogresses? Most women have amazing minds–full of insight that is quite often brilliant. How can you possibly say there have been no female scientists? What about Jane Goodall and Diane Fossey and Grace Hopper and Marie Curie? All you have is that short, skinny, sad-looking Albert Einstein. And look at his hair! He couldn’t even manage to run a comb through that miserable mop.

Do you think Marie Curie whined and nagged? No! She was far too busy making discoveries. Then I’ll bet she had to cook and clean and dust because her husband was lazy and incompetent. Do you think that miserable Albert Einstein could have saved Marie Curie from an animal attack? I doubt he could save himself.

You’ve overstepped this time, Stu Cranstence. I demand an apology on behalf of all women.

]]>